Implementation of a protocol for management of antepartum iron deficiency anemia: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In randomized trials, antepartum intravenous iron sucrose is effective at improving predelivery hemoglobin in iron deficiency anemia. Yet, there is a gap between this knowledge and its implementation into care. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine if the implementation of a standardized protocol for the management of antepartum anemia outside of a clinical trial improves intravenous iron sucrose utilization and clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a prospective cohort study evaluating the incorporation of an anemia protocol into routine clinical care for women with antepartum hemoglobin <11.0 g/dL. Our protocol, developed with multidisciplinary stakeholders, included (1) serial third trimester hemoglobin assessment, (2) oral iron supplementation for antepartum hemoglobin 9.5-11 g/dL, and (3) antepartum intravenous iron sucrose use (300 mg weekly for 3 weeks) for hemoglobin <9.5 g/dL. We compared 6-months preimplementation (January 2018 to June 2018) to 6-months postimplementation (January 2019 to June 2019). The outcomes evaluated were antepartum intravenous iron sucrose utilization, the number of intravenous iron sucrose dosages, predelivery hemoglobin, and blood transfusion. RESULTS: A total of 1423 women were included (pre=778; post=645) without significant baseline differences. The antepartum hemoglobin nadir was no different between the groups (pre: 10.2; interquartile range [9.6-10.6] vs post: 10.2; interquartile range [9.6-10.6]; P=.77). The implementation of a standardized protocol for the management of antepartum anemia was associated with 80% increased odds of receiving intravenous iron sucrose than the preimplementation group (pre: 4.8% vs post: 8.2%, P=.008; odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, [1.16-2.77]). The implementation of a standardized protocol for the management of antepartum iron deficiency anemia was also associated with higher hemoglobin at admission for delivery (pre: 10.9; interquartile range [10.1-11.6] vs post: 11.0; interquartile range [10.3-11.7], P=.048). There were no significant differences between the groups in blood product transfusion (pre: 7.1% vs post: 5.1%, P=.13). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a standardized antepartum anemia protocol is associated with increased intravenous iron sucrose utilization and improvement in predelivery hemoglobin.

Addition of oral iron bisglycinate to intravenous iron sucrose for the treatment of postpartum anemia-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Studies that have compared the effectiveness of oral with intravenous iron supplements to treat postpartum anemia have shown mixed results. The superiority of one mode of treatment vs the other has yet to be demonstrated. Therefore, despite guidelines and standards of care, treatment approaches vary across practices. A single 500 mg dose of iron sucrose, which is higher than what is usually administered, has not been evaluated to treat postpartum moderate to severe anemia. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intravenous iron sucrose alone with intravenous iron sucrose in combination with oral iron bisglycinate supplementation in treating moderate to severe postpartum anemia. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted between February 2015 and June 2020. Women with postpartum hemoglobin level of ≤9.5 g/dL were treated with 500 mg intravenous iron sucrose after an anemia workup, which ruled out other causes for anemia. In addition to receiving intravenous iron, women were randomly allocated to receive either 60 mg of oral iron bisglycinate for 45 days or no further iron supplementation. The primary outcome was hemoglobin level at 6 weeks after delivery. Secondary outcomes were iron storage parameters and quality of life. RESULTS: Of 158 patients who participated, 63 women receiving intravenous and oral iron, and 44 women receiving intravenous iron-only, completed the study and were included in the analysis. Baseline and obstetrical characteristics were similar between the study cohorts. Although statistically significant, postpartum hemoglobin levels were only 0.4 g/dL higher in the intravenous and oral iron than intravenous iron-only cohort (12.4 g/dL vs 12.0 g/dL, respectively; P=.03), with a respective increase from baseline of 4.2 g/dL vs 3.7 g/dL (P=.03). There was no difference in the rate of women with hemoglobin level of <12.0 or 11.0 g/dL. Iron storage and health quality were not different between the cohorts. Oral iron treatment was associated with 29% rate of adverse effects. Compliance and satisfaction from treatment protocol were high in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Intravenous 500 mg iron sucrose treatment alone is sufficient to treat postpartum anemia without the necessity of adding oral iron treatment.

Selenium supplementation in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy: a proof-of-concept trial.

BACKGROUND: We studied the efficacy and safety of selenium supplementation in patients who had peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) and selenium deficiency. METHODS: We randomly assigned 100 PPCM patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 45% and selenium deficiency (< 70 µg/L) to receive either oral Selenium (L-selenomethionine) 200 µg/day for 3 months or nothing, in addition to recommended therapy, in an open-label randomised trial. The primary outcome was a composite of persistence of heart failure (HF) symptoms, unrecovered LV systolic function (LVEF < 55%) or death from any cause. RESULTS: Over a median of 19 months, the primary outcome occurred in 36 of 46 patients (78.3%) in the selenium group and in 43 of 54 patients (79.6%) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-1.09; p = 0.113). Persistence of HF symptoms occurred in 18 patients (39.1%) in the selenium group and in 37 patients (68.5%) in the control group (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.30-0.93; p = 0.006). LVEF < 55% occurred in 33 patients (71.7%) in the selenium group and in 38 patients (70.4%) in the control group (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.57-1.45; p = 0.944). Death from any cause occurred in 3 patients (6.5%) in the selenium group and in 9 patients (16.7%) in the control group (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.10-1.37; p = 0.137). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, selenium supplementation did not reduce the risk of the primary outcome, but it significantly reduced HF symptoms, and there was a trend towards a reduction of all-cause mortality. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03081949.

Regulation effect and mechanism of Sheng-Hua-Tang on female reproductive system: From experimental transcriptomic analysis to clinical applications.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Sheng-Hua-Tang (SHT) is commonly used to treat female illnesses, especially postpartum conditioning. However, its effects and mechanisms on female reproductive system remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of SHT on female brain-ovary-uterus axis from bench to clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mice were administrated SHT (200 mg/kg) orally for seven consecutive days. Brain, ovary, and uterus tissues were then collected for microarray analysis. A nationwide database analysis and a pilot randomized, open-label clinical trial were further applied to evaluate the clinical application and effects of SHT on postpartum women. RESULTS: Microarray analysis showed that oral administration of SHT induced a cascade reaction of gene expression, with 17, 883, and 1592 genes were significantly regulated by SHT in brain, ovary, and uterus, respectively. Population-based analysis of one million subjects in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between 1997 and 2013 showed that SHT was commonly used in menstrual disorders in female population, especially dysmenorrhea, abnormal uterine bleeding, and variation of menstrual cycle. Clinical trial on postpartum women showed that oral administration SHT for one week alleviated uterine contraction pain and breast swelling pain. Furthermore, Mmp2, Mmp3, Mmp9, Mmp11, Mmp15, Oxtr, Plrl, and Tph2 gene expression affected by SHT in mice were correlated with clinical effects of SHT in human subjects. CONCLUSION: This report provided the scientific evidences of mechanisms and clinical efficacies of SHT. Moreover, our findings might afford insights for clinical doctors in terms of SHT prescription.

Laboratory confirmed puerperal sepsis in a national referral hospital in Tanzania: etiological agents and their susceptibility to commonly prescribed antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: In most developing countries, puerperal sepsis is treated empirically with broad spectrum antibiotics due to lack of resources for culture and antibiotics susceptibility testing. However, empirical treatment does not guarantee treatment success and may promote antimicrobial resistance. We set to determine etiological agents and susceptibility pattern to commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents, among women suspected of puerperal sepsis, and admitted at Muhimbili National Hospital. METHODS: Hospital based cross-sectional study conducted at tertiary hospital from December 2017 to April 2018. The study recruited post-delivery women suspected with puerperal sepsis. Socio- demographic, clinical and obstetric information were collected using structured questionnaire. Blood and endocervical swab samples were collected for aerobic culture. Blood culture bottles were incubated in BACTEC FX40 (Becton-Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA). Positive blood cultures and cervical swabs were inoculated onto sheep blood agar, MacConkey agar, chocolate agar and Sabouraud's dextrose agar, incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 18-24 h. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. RESULTS: A total of 197women were recruited, of whom 50.3% had spontaneous vaginal delivery, while 49.2% had caesarean section. Bacteraemia was detected in 22 (11.2%) women, along with 86 (43.6%) isolated from endocervical swabs. Gram-negative bacilli were the predominant isolates detected in 92(46.7%) cases. Majority of the isolates were E. coli 68(61.8%) followed by Klebsiella spp. 22(20.0%). E. coli were highly susceptible to meropenem (97.0%), while resistance to ceftriaxone, ampicillin and ceftazidime was 64.7, 67.6 and 63.2%, respectively. Klebsiella spp. were susceptible to meropenem (86.4%) and resistant to ceftriaxone (77.3%), gentamicin (86.4%), ampicillin (81.8%) and ceftazidime (86.4%). Staphylococcus aureus isolates were 100% susceptible to clindamycin. The proportion of extended spectrum beta lactamase producers among gram-negative bacilli was 64(69.6%) and 53.8% of S. aureus isolates were resistant to methicillin. CONCLUSION: In this study puerperal sepsis was mostly caused by E. coli and Klebsiella spp. Causative agents exhibited very high levels of resistance to most antibiotics used in empiric treatment calling for review of treatment guidelines and strict infection control procedures.

Raynaud Phenomenon of the Nipple: An Under-Recognized Condition.

BACKGROUND: Obstetricians often feel ill-equipped to address the symptom of breast pain in pregnant and postpartum patients. CASES: In the first case, a 40-year-old woman in the second trimester of pregnancy reported nipple discoloration and severe pain. She was treated with nifedipine, and her symptoms decreased quickly and markedly. In the second case, a 32-year-old woman presented for a routine postpartum visit. She described breast pain and sporadic purple discoloration of the nipples, a finding confirmed on examination. Conservative measures of maintaining warmth were recommended. CONCLUSION: Raynaud phenomenon of the nipple is an underdiagnosed condition affecting women in both the prenatal and postpartum periods. A careful history and physical must be obtained in women presenting with breast pain, because diagnosis and treatment allows breastfeeding continuation and mitigation of symptoms.

Exposure Concentrations of Infants Breastfed by Women Receiving Biologic Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and Effects of Breastfeeding on Infections and Development.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Exposure to biologic and immunosuppressant agents during breastfeeding is controversial, and there are limited data on safety. We investigated whether biologics are detectable in breast milk from women receiving treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) and whether breastfeeding while receiving treatment is associated with infections or developmental delays. METHODS: We performed a multicenter prospective study of women with IBD and their infants, collecting breast milk samples (n = 72) from patients receiving biologic therapy from October 2013 to November 2015. Drug concentrations were measured in all breast milk samples at several time points within 48 hours of collection and within 168 hours for some samples. Child development was assessed using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3, completed by 824 women with IBD (treated or untreated) during pregnancy (620 breastfed, and 204 did not). Data on children's health and development were obtained from mothers and pediatricians, along with information on mothers' medication exposure, IBD history, activity, pregnancy, and postpartum complications. We used chi-squared method or Fisher exact test to determine associations between categorical values and compared differences in continuous outcomes between groups using analysis of variance models. The primary outcome was drug concentration of biologic agents in breast milk (from 72 women) at 1, 12, 24, and 48 hours after dosing and also at 72, 96, 120, and 168 hours for available samples. Secondary outcomes were a range of infant infections and Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3-defined developmental delays among all breastfed infants. RESULTS: We detected infliximab in breast milk samples from 19 of 29 treated women (maximum, 0.74 µg/mL), adalimumab in 2 of 21 treated women (maximum, 0.71 µg/mL), certolizumab in 3 of 13 treated women (maximum, 0.29 µg/mL), natalizumab in 1 of 2 treated women (maximum, 0.46 µg/mL), and ustekinumab in 4 of 6 treated women (maximum, 1.57 µg/mL); we did not detect golimumab in breast milk from the 1 woman receiving this drug. Rates of infection and developmental milestones at 12 months were similar in breastfed vs non-breastfed infants: any infection, 39% vs 39% in control individuals (P > .99) and milestone score, 87 vs 86 in control individuals (P = .9992). Rates of infection and developmental milestones did not differ among infants whose mothers received treatment with biologics, immunomodulators, or combination therapy compared with unexposed infants (whose mothers received treatment with mesalamines or steroids or no medication). CONCLUSIONS: In a study of women receiving treatment for IBD and their infants, we detected low concentrations of infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, natalizumab, and ustekinumab in breast milk samples. We found breastfed infants of mothers on biologics, immunomodulators, or combination therapies to have similar risks of infection and rates of milestone achievement compared with non-breastfed infants or infants unexposed to these drugs. Maternal use of biologic therapy appears compatible with breastfeeding. Clinicaltrials.gov no.: NCT00904878.

Safety and efficacy of intravenous iron administration for uterine bleeding or postpartum anaemia: a narrative review.

The management of iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) consists of oral or intravenous administration of iron supplements. The aim of this narrative review is to summarise information regarding the treatment of IDA in women who have postpartum anaemia or uterine bleeding with intravenous (IV) or oral iron supplements. Fourteen randomised control studies comparing IV to oral iron treatment for IDA in 2913 women with uterine bleeding or postpartum haemorrhage are included. All reviewed studies suggest that IV iron administration is important in treating the IDA in such women and in improving their physical performance and quality of life. Comparisons among intravenous iron supplements show advantages of ferric carboxymaltose over others in time of reaching desired haemoglobin and ferritin values and in adverse reactions. Despite the limitation that the above evidence emerges from not systematically collected data, our review highlights that new forms of IV iron supplements seem safe and efficient in treating IDA.

Postpartum Hypertension: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management.

IMPORTANCE: Postpartum hypertension complicates approximately 2% of pregnancies and, similar to antepartum severe hypertension, can have devastating consequences including maternal death. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to increase the knowledge and skills of women's health care providers in understanding, diagnosing, and managing hypertension in the postpartum period. RESULTS: Hypertension complicating pregnancy, including postpartum, is defined as systolic blood pressure 140 mm Hg or greater and/or diastolic blood pressure 90 mm Hg or greater on 2 or more occasions at least 4 hours apart. Severe hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure 160 mm Hg or greater and/or diastolic blood pressure 110 mm Hg or greater on 2 or more occasions repeated at a short interval (minutes). Workup for secondary causes of hypertension should be pursued, especially in patients with severe or resistant hypertension, hypokalemia, abnormal creatinine, or a strong family history of renal disease. Because severe hypertension is known to cause maternal stroke, women with severe hypertension sustained over 15 minutes during pregnancy or in the postpartum period should be treated with fast-acting antihypertension medication. Labetalol, hydralazine, and nifedipine are all effective for acute management, although nifedipine may work the fastest. For persistent postpartum hypertension, a long-acting antihypertensive agent should be started. Labetalol and nifedipine are also both effective, but labetalol may achieve control at a lower dose with fewer adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Providers must be aware of the risks associated with postpartum hypertension and educate women about the symptoms of postpartum preeclampsia. Severe acute hypertension should be treated in a timely fashion to avoid morbidity and mortality. Women with persistent postpartum hypertension should be administered a long-acting antihypertensive agent. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians. LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After completing this activity, the learner should be better able to assist patients and providers in identifying postpartum hypertension; provide a framework for the evaluation of new-onset postpartum hypertension; and provide instructions for the management of acute severe and persistent postpartum hypertension.

Committee Opinion No. 692 Summary: Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset, Severe Hypertension During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

Acute-onset, severe systolic hypertension; severe diastolic hypertension; or both can occur during the prenatal, intrapartum, or postpartum periods. Pregnant women or women in the postpartum period with acute-onset, severe systolic hypertension; severe diastolic hypertension; or both require urgent antihypertensive therapy. Introducing standardized, evidence-based clinical guidelines for the management of patients with preeclampsia and eclampsia has been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of adverse maternal outcomes. Individuals and institutions should have mechanisms in place to initiate the prompt administration of medication when a patient presents with a hypertensive emergency. Treatment with first-line agents should be expeditious and occur as soon as possible within 30-60 minutes of confirmed severe hypertension to reduce the risk of maternal stroke. Intravenous labetalol and hydralazine have long been considered first-line medications for the management of acute-onset, severe hypertension in pregnant women and women in the postpartum period. Although relatively less information currently exists for the use of calcium channel blockers for this clinical indication, the available evidence suggests that immediate release oral nifedipine also may be considered as a first-line therapy, particularly when intravenous access is not available. In the rare circumstance that intravenous bolus labetalol, hydralazine, or immediate release oral nifedipine fails to relieve acute-onset, severe hypertension and is given in successive appropriate doses, emergent consultation with an anesthesiologist, maternal-fetal medicine subspecialist, or critical care subspecialist to discuss second-line intervention is recommended.

Committee Opinion No. 692: Emergent Therapy for Acute-Onset, Severe Hypertension During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

Acute-onset, severe systolic hypertension; severe diastolic hypertension; or both can occur during the prenatal, intrapartum, or postpartum periods. Pregnant women or women in the postpartum period with acute-onset, severe systolic hypertension; severe diastolic hypertension; or both require urgent antihypertensive therapy. Introducing standardized, evidence-based clinical guidelines for the management of patients with preeclampsia and eclampsia has been demonstrated to reduce the incidence of adverse maternal outcomes. Individuals and institutions should have mechanisms in place to initiate the prompt administration of medication when a patient presents with a hypertensive emergency. Treatment with first-line agents should be expeditious and occur as soon as possible within 30-60 minutes of confirmed severe hypertension to reduce the risk of maternal stroke. Intravenous labetalol and hydralazine have long been considered first-line medications for the management of acute-onset, severe hypertension in pregnant women and women in the postpartum period. Although relatively less information currently exists for the use of calcium channel blockers for this clinical indication, the available evidence suggests that immediate release oral nifedipine also may be considered as a first-line therapy, particularly when intravenous access is not available. In the rare circumstance that intravenous bolus labetalol, hydralazine, or immediate release oral nifedipine fails to relieve acute-onset, severe hypertension and is given in successive appropriate doses, emergent consultation with an anesthesiologist, maternal-fetal medicine subspecialist, or critical care subspecialist to discuss second-line intervention is recommended.

Oral labetalol compared to oral nifedipine for postpartum hypertension: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether oral labetalol is associated with a shorter time to blood pressure control compared to oral extended release nifedipine for management of persistent postpartum hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial conducted between June 2014 and June 2015 included women who delivered at ≥32 weeks' gestation with persistent postpartum hypertension (sustained blood pressure ≥150/100 mmHg) requiring an oral antihypertensive agent. We included women with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or chronic hypertension not previously on medication. Women were randomized to labetalol or nifedipine, and the allocated study drug was incrementally increased to achieve blood pressure control. The primary outcome was time to sustained blood pressure control defined as the absence of severe hypertension for at least 12 hours. Secondary outcomes included postpartum length of stay, need for increased dosing, need for additional oral antihypertensive agents, and patient reported side effects. Twenty women were needed in each group as determined by the sample size calculation. RESULTS: We randomized 25 women to oral labetalol and 25 women to oral extended release nifedipine. The time to achieve BP control was similar between labetalol and nifedipine groups (37.6 hours versus 38.2 hours, p = 0.51). Secondary outcomes including postpartum length of stay, need for increased dosing, and need for additional oral antihypertensive agents were similar between groups. For women discharged on a single agent, significantly more subjects in the labetalol group (16/21) compared to the nifedipine group (10/22) achieved BP control with the initial starting dose (76% versus 46%, p = 0.04). No major side effects were observed. Minor side effects were significantly more common in women taking nifedipine compared to labetalol (48% versus 20%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Both labetalol and nifedipine were effective for control of persistent postpartum hypertension. However, labetalol achieved control significantly more often with the starting dose and had fewer side effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Oral nifedipine versus oral labetalol, NCT02168309. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02168309?term=labetalol+versus+nifedipine&rank=2.

Furosemide in postpartum management of severe preeclampsia: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension in the postpartum period is a common phenomenon and is often a cause for concern. Following delivery, fluid that has been sequestered in the extravascular space is mobilized, producing a large auto-infusion of fluid from the extravascular to the intravascular compartment. As a result of this fluid mobilization process, there is an increase in central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, which might favor the development of pulmonary edema. Thus, diuretics logically might be a better choice as antihypertensive medication in such a scenario. METHODS: A total of 108 antenatal women diagnosed with having severe preeclampsia, with two high blood pressure recordings of ≥150/100 mm of Hg in the postpartum period within the first 24 hours of delivery, were enrolled in the study. These patients were randomly divided into two groups (Group A: furosemide 20 mg OD + nifedipine & Group B: nifedipine alone). Main outcome measures studied were reduction in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures, requirement of additional antihypertensive drugs to control blood pressure, duration of hospital stay, and antihypertensive requirement at discharge. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable for distribution of age and parity and presence of imminent symptoms and eclampsia. There was no significant difference in mean systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures (MAPs) between both the groups at admission. Mean gestational age at delivery was 36 weeks in both the groups. Requirement of additional antihypertensive was significantly higher in women in group B (26.0% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.017). Duration of hospital and postpartum stay and the use of antihypertensive at discharge were similar in both the groups Conclusion: In conclusion, the use of a short course of furosemide along with nifedipine significantly reduces the need of additional antihypertensive in severe preeclamptic women with postpartum hypertension when compared to women who received nifedipine alone.

Dolor persistente posparto. Tratamiento con procaína subdérmica (terapia neural) / Postpartumchronic pain. Subderma/ procaine treatment - neura/ therapy

OBJETIVO: Evaluar la efectividad de la administración de procaína subdérmica en bajas dosis en la cicatriz del parto vaginal o por cesárea para el alivio del dolor persistente posparto. Pacientes, material y métodos: Estudio observacional y prospectivo de abril de 2014 a marzo de 2016, en mujeres con dolor persistente después de 10 días posparto. Se valoraron: variables demográficas, variables clínicas y obstétricas, motivo de consulta, grado del dolor según la escala visual analógica (EVA), y número de dosis de tratamiento recibidas y coste por dosis. El tratamiento utilizado fue la inyección subdérmica con procaína (1 mg/kg) en sesiones quincenales, hasta conseguir un dolor ≤1 según la EVA. RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron 168 mujeres. La media de dolor antes del tratamiento fue de 5,52 en la escala EVA y de 0,17 al final, con una p <0,001. La edad mostró diferencias significativas interpacientes con una p <0,001, donde las pacientes mayores de 40 años tuvieron una valoración inicial del dolor más alta y por tanto necesitaron más sesiones, aunque también consiguieron un grado de dolor ≤1. El 80,9% de las pacientes terminaron el tratamiento a los 30 días con la tercera sesión. CONCLUSIÓN: La aplicación de procaína subdérmica está asociada a la disminución del dolor persistente posparto

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness of low doses of subdermal procaine administered into vaginal labor and C-section scars to alleviate persistent postpartum pain. Subjects, materials and methodology: Observational and prospective study carried out from April 2014 to March 2016 in I 71 women suffering from persistent pain after 10 days of postpartum. Variables taken into account: demographics, clinical and obstetric differences, pain level according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), amount of doses of treatment, and cost per dose. The treatment used was one subdermal injection of procaine ( I mg/kg) every two weeks until achieving a pain level of s I according to the VAS. RESULTS: 168 women were studied. The average pain level before treatment was 5.52 according to the VAS, and 0.17 after treatment (p < 0.00 I ). Age was one of the most significant differences among patients with a p < 0.001. Patients over 40 assessed their initial pain at a higher level and therefore needed more doses. However, they also achieved a pain level of ≤ 1.80.9% of patients finished their treatment after 30 days with their third dose. CONCLUSION: Applying subdermal procaine has shown to be effective in treating persistent postpartum pain

Perineal pain in focus: reviewing topical anaesthetic treatments.

Midwives have opportunities to help postnatal mothers to minimise perineal discomfort associated with perineal trauma following vaginal birth. Perineal trauma and associated pain is common and can have a negative impact on the physical, psycho-social transition to motherhood and family life. This article considers the role local anaesthetic agents have in helping women to relieve perineal pain. Key evidence is presented with associated practice considerations, and future research areas are suggested to broaden our understanding of this important aspect of postnatal care.

The Use of Parenteral Iron Therapy for the Treatment of Postpartum Anemia.

Rates of postpartum hemorrhage have been increasing in Canada over the last 10 years, with postpartum iron deficiency anemia as the most common consequence. Postpartum anemia is treated with oral iron supplementation and/or blood transfusion. Recent studies have evaluated the use of parenteral iron as a better tolerated treatment modality. Compared with oral iron supplements, parenteral iron is associated with a more rapid rise in serum ferritin and hemoglobin and improved maternal fatigue scores in the postpartum period. It may also decrease rates of blood transfusion. Parenteral iron may be considered in select clinical situations for the treatment of postpartum anemia.

Les taux d'hémorragie postpartum ont connu une hausse au Canada depuis les 10 dernières années, la manifestation d'une anémie ferriprive postpartum en étant la conséquence la plus courante. L'anémie postpartum est prise en charge au moyen d'une supplémentation orale en fer et/ou d'une transfusion sanguine. De récentes études ayant évalué l'utilisation de fer parentéral ont indiqué qu'il s'agissait d'une modalité de traitement mieux tolérée. Par comparaison avec les suppléments oraux de fer, le fer parentéral est associé à une hausse plus rapide des taux sériques de ferritine et d'hémoglobine, en plus de mener à une amélioration des scores de fatigue maternelle au cours de la période postpartum. Le fer parentéral pourrait également mener à une diminution des taux de transfusion sanguine. Son utilisation pourrait être envisagée dans certaines situations cliniques particulières, aux fins de la prise en charge de l'anémie postpartum.

Prophylaxis and therapeutic potential of ozone in buiatrics: Current knowledge.

Ozone therapy has been in use since 1896 in the USA. As a highly reactive molecule, ozone may inactivate bacteria, viruses, fungi, yeasts and protozoans, stimulate the oxygen metabolism of tissue, treat diseases, activate the immune system, and exhibit strong analgesic activity. More recently, ozone has been used in veterinary medicine, particularly in buiatrics, but still insufficiently. Medical ozone therapy has shown effectiveness as an alternative to the use of antibiotics, which are restricted to clinical use and have been withdrawn from non-clinical use as in-feed growth promoters in animal production. This review is an overview of current knowledge regarding the preventive and therapeutic effects of ozone in ruminants for the treatment of puerperal diseases and improvement in their fertility. In particular, ozone preparations have been tested in the treatment of reproductive tract lesions, urovagina and pneumomovagina, metritis, endometritis, fetal membrane retention and mastitis, as well as in the functional restoration of endometrium in dairy cows and goats. In addition, the preventive use of the intrauterine application of ozone has been assessed in order to evaluate its effectiveness in improving reproductive efficiency in dairy cows. No adverse effects were observed in cows and goats treated with ozone preparations. Moreover, there is a lot of evidence indicating the advantages of ozone preparation therapy in comparison to the application of antibiotics. However, there are certain limitations on ozone use in veterinary medicine and buiatrics, such as inactivity against intracellular microbes and selective activity against the same bacterial species, as well as the induction of tissue inflammation through inappropriate application of the preparation.

[Discussion on application of Chinese medicine treatment of gynecological diseases].

With rapid social development rhythm, the incidence of gynecological diseases gradually rise. Traditional Chinese medicine has made irreplaceable position in the treatment of gynecological disease. Due to the characteristics of gynecological diseases, the syndrome differentiation and treatment has unique characteristics. In this paper, according to menstrual disease, leukorrheal diseases, pregnancy diseases, puerperal diseases and miscellaneous diseases in order, combining documents discussion and old doctors of traditional Chinese medicine treatment of gynecological disease experiences, illustrate the key points of drug selection in the treatment process. We can get a revelation that appropriate choice of tradition Chinese medicine is an indispensable part for healing effects. Through the analysis of characteristics of drugs, we can understand the feature of each period in disease of department of gynecology, increase the ability of usinig traditional Chinese medicine and improve the level of clinical treatment.

Blood calcium dynamics after prophylactic treatment of subclinical hypocalcemia with oral or intravenous calcium.

Total serum Ca dynamics and urine pH levels were evaluated after prophylactic treatment of subclinical hypocalcemia after parturition in 33 multiparous Jersey × Holstein crossbreed cows. Cows were blocked according to their calcemic status at the time of treatment [normocalcemic (8.0-9.9 mg/dL; n = 15) or hypocalcemic (5.0-7.9 mg/dL; n = 18)] and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: control [no Ca supplementation (n = 11)]; intravenous Ca [Ca-IV (n = 11), 500 mL of 23% calcium gluconate (10.7 g of Ca and 17.5 g of boric acid as a solubilizing agent; Durvet, Blue Springs, MO)]; or oral Ca [Ca-Oral (n = 11), 1 oral bolus (Bovikalc bolus, Boehringer Ingelheim, St. Joseph, MO) containing CaCl2 and CaSO4 (43 g of Ca) 2 times 12h apart]. Total serum Ca levels were evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, and 48 h, and urine pH was evaluated at 0, 1, 12, 24, 36, and 4 8h after treatment initiation. Total serum Ca levels were higher for Ca-IV than for control and Ca-Oral cows at 1, 2, and 4h after treatment initiation, but lower than Ca-Oral cows at 20, 24, and 36 h and lower than control cows at 36 and 48 h. At 1h after treatment initiation, when serum Ca levels for Ca-IV cows peaked (11.4 mg/dL), a greater proportion of Ca-IV (n = 8) cows had total serum Ca levels >10mg/dL than control (n = 0) and Ca-Oral (n = 1) cows. At 24h after treatment initiation, when Ca-IV cows reached the total serum Ca nadir (6.4 mg/dL), a greater proportion of Ca-IV (n = 10) cows had serum Ca levels <8 mg/dL than control (n = 5) and Ca-Oral (n = 2) cows. Treatment, time, and treatment × time interaction were significant for urine pH. Mean urine pH was lower for Ca-Oral cows (6.69) than for control (7.52) and Ca-IV (7.19) cows. Urine pH levels at 1h after treatment were lower for Ca-IV cows compared with both control and Ca-Oral cows, a finding likely associated with the iatrogenic administration of boric acid added as a solubilizing agent of the intravenous Ca solution used. At 12, 24, and 36 h, urine pH levels were lower for Ca-Oral cows compared with both control and Ca-IV cows. This was expected because the oral Ca supplementation used (Bovikalc) is designed as an acidifying agent. Wide fluctuations in blood Ca were observed after prophylactic intravenous Ca supplementation. The implications for milk production and animal health, if any, of these transient changes in total serum Ca have yet to be evaluated.